<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A grammatical question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuartmeldrum.co.uk/blog/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuartmeldrum.co.uk/blog/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/</link>
	<description>Technological Education, it's an adventure!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://stuartmeldrum.co.uk/blog/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/comment-page-1/#comment-22251</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolfillment.co.uk/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/#comment-22251</guid>
		<description>In the example you give it should be each other&#039;s.  The way to test it is to write out in full what you mean by using the word &quot;of&quot;.  In your example what you mean is &quot;of each other&quot;.  So you replace the &quot;of&quot; with an &#039;s at the end of &quot;other&quot;, making &quot;other&#039;s&quot;.  

There might of course be situations where you mean &quot;of the others&quot; (where others is plural ie. refers to a group of more than one person).  For example if you want to say &quot;John wished he enjoyed the trust of the others in the class&quot;, others is a plural, so it would become &quot;John wished he enjoyed the others&#039; trust.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the example you give it should be each other&#8217;s.  The way to test it is to write out in full what you mean by using the word &#8220;of&#8221;.  In your example what you mean is &#8220;of each other&#8221;.  So you replace the &#8220;of&#8221; with an &#8217;s at the end of &#8220;other&#8221;, making &#8220;other&#8217;s&#8221;.  </p>
<p>There might of course be situations where you mean &#8220;of the others&#8221; (where others is plural ie. refers to a group of more than one person).  For example if you want to say &#8220;John wished he enjoyed the trust of the others in the class&#8221;, others is a plural, so it would become &#8220;John wished he enjoyed the others&#8217; trust.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://stuartmeldrum.co.uk/blog/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/comment-page-1/#comment-22040</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolfillment.co.uk/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/#comment-22040</guid>
		<description>I already have the book but I was still a little unsure, turns out I was right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already have the book but I was still a little unsure, turns out I was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord of All</title>
		<link>http://stuartmeldrum.co.uk/blog/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/comment-page-1/#comment-21882</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord of All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolfillment.co.uk/2005/04/26/a-grammatical-question/#comment-21882</guid>
		<description>You should borrow the &quot;Eats, Shoots and Leaves&quot; book from your sister.

The apostrophe denotes that the noun following is owned by &quot;each other&quot;.  It should be the first one.  The second one doesn&#039;t really mean anything.

I had always thought, though, that if something ends in &#039;s&#039;, that you have an apostrophe afterwards, like:
 &lt;blockquote&gt;Chris&#039;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But the book reckons this is just a slip which has come into English, and that the correct thing to write is:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Chris&#039;s&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But you should read that book.  It&#039;s short and informative, especially for poor souls like us who weren&#039;t taught grammar at school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should borrow the &#8220;Eats, Shoots and Leaves&#8221; book from your sister.</p>
<p>The apostrophe denotes that the noun following is owned by &#8220;each other&#8221;.  It should be the first one.  The second one doesn&#8217;t really mean anything.</p>
<p>I had always thought, though, that if something ends in &#8217;s&#8217;, that you have an apostrophe afterwards, like:</p>
<blockquote><p>Chris&#8217;</p></blockquote>
<p>But the book reckons this is just a slip which has come into English, and that the correct thing to write is:</p>
<blockquote><p>Chris&#8217;s</p></blockquote>
<p>But you should read that book.  It&#8217;s short and informative, especially for poor souls like us who weren&#8217;t taught grammar at school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
